Northumberland County Council (21 019 119)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Apr 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Ms X complains about the Council’s grant of planning permission for a development next to her home. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains about the Council’s grant of planning permission for a development next to her home.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I considered the complainant’s comments on my draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X’s neighbour submitted a planning application for a development of apartments near her house. Ms X objected and the matter was considered by a Planning Committee. Ms X attended and spoke at the Planning Committee and wrote the Planning Committee separately prior to the meeting.
  2. The Planning Officer report specifically refers to Ms X’s property. The Planning Officer noted that some of the windows were to be obscure glazed and the distances between the properties was such that there would be no overlooking. The Planning Officer noted that only non-habitable rooms might be overshadowed. Further, a privacy screen (which was to be the subject of a planning condition) was to be incorporated in a flat roof to reduce any loss of privacy.
  3. I appreciate that Ms X is unhappy with the effect upon her property and her amenity but I am satisfied that the Council properly considered the effect upon her. In the absence of administrative fault, the Ombudsman cannot question the professional judgment of the Planning Officer or the Planning Committee’s decision to approve the planning application.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings