South Lakeland District Council (21 015 752)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Mar 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint which was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mrs X could not have complained to us sooner.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained about the Council’s approval of a neighbour’s planning application in 2017. She says the development affects her amenity and that the Council refused a similar application which she made in the past. She says the approval was carried out in an underhand manner and has not been checked for compliance.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X says the Council approved a neighbour’s planning application in 2017 to build a new bungalow and a store for their business use. She says the new property affects her amenity and that the business use causes disturbance by vehicle movements.
  2. Mrs X did not object to the application in 2017 and she complained about it to the Council in 2020. The Council told her the development has been built to the approved plans and was approved by delegated authority which is the normal procedure for these types of development. Her amenity was taken into account in the case officer’s report at the time and there were no grounds to refuse the plans.
  3. Following Mrs X’s complaint that the business use was being breached the Council opened a planning enforcement case. It was closed in 2021 when it decided there was no breach of the planning conditions and enforcement was not appropriate.
  4. Mrs X was aware of the plans more than 12 months before she complained to us. She also made a complaint to the Council in 2020 and did not complain to us until 2022. There is no evidence to suggest that she could not have complained to us sooner

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint which was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mrs X could not have complained to us sooner.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings