Sevenoaks District Council (21 014 795)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint, made on behalf of Mrs X, about how the Council determined her planning application. Mrs X has used her right of appeal to the Planning Inspectorate against the Council’s refusal decision. We do not have jurisdiction to investigate where someone has used that appeal right.

The complaint

  1. Mr X lives with Mrs X. She applied to the Council for planning permission for a new development on their property, which was refused by the planning committee.
  2. Mr X complains about the way the Council dealt with his wife’s planning application. He says officers made material errors which affected the committee’s decision.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal or a government minister or started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6), as amended)
  3. The Planning Inspectorate acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Inspectorate considers appeals about:
    • delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission;
    • a decision to refuse planning permission;
    • conditions placed on planning permission;
    • planning enforcement notices.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X, the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code, and relevant online planning information about the application.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X’s use of her appeal to the Planning Inspectorate means we have no jurisdiction to investigate this complaint. The legislation which sets out the limits of our powers prevents us from investigating it, or any part of the process once the application was submitted.
  2. Mrs X’s planning proposal is now before the Inspectorate for its consideration. Whether planning permission should be granted is now a matter for the Inspectorate. It is an expert body whose decisions are binding on the Council. It will consider her application afresh. The Inspectorate can also consider costs applications. If Mr and Mrs X believed the appeal would not have been necessary had the Council dealt with the matter reasonably, it was open to them to submit a claim for their costs as part of their appeal.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint, made on behalf of Mrs X, because Mrs X’s use of her appeal to the Planning Inspectorate against the Council’s refusal of her application takes the matter outside our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings