Northumberland County Council (21 014 479)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Feb 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains about planning permission for lighting opposite his house. We will not investigate this complaint because the matter is out of time and there is no evidence of fault.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about planning permission for lighting opposite his house.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I considered the complainant’s comments on my draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. A planning application for a development opposite Mr X’s house was granted in 2017. The planning application partly related to lighting on an access drive. The Council discharged a condition requiring details of that lighting in 2019.
  2. I consider a complaint about the planning permission and subsequent discharge could reasonably have been made within 12 months of the decisions and so the complaint is out of time.
  3. The Council has since investigated whether the lighting is a statutory nuisance or in breach of planning permission and concluded that there are no grounds for further action.
  4. It is not for the Ombudsman to question the conclusions reached by the Council where they have properly considered a matter. The decisions therefore not to take enforcement action (planning and environmental health) were made without administrative fault and the Ombudsman would not therefore investigate these matters.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because the matter is out of time and there is no evidence of administrative fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings