Birmingham City Council (21 012 808)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr and Ms X complain about planning permission granted by the Council for a neighbour’s extension. We will not investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr and Ms X complain about planning permission granted by the Council for a neighbour’s extension.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainants and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. The complainants had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The complainants’ neighbour submitted a planning application for an extension at the front and rear of their property in 2020. The Council granted planning permission in November 2020.
  2. The complainants argue that the extension will reduce the light into their rooms.
  3. The Planning Officer considered the effect upon their property. The Planning Officer noted that, although the 45 degree rule was satisfied, the planning application did not meet the Council’s planning policy as it failed to meet the 5m per storey separation distance but only in relation to the neighbour on the other side of the development. The Planning Officer noted that the extension would reduce the light to the complainants’ house.
  4. Nevertheless, the Planning Officer concluded that, with the position and height of the fence, the extension would not cause such loss of amenity as to warrant refusal of the planning application.
  5. I am satisfied that the Planning Officer had before them scaled plans, and all objections before the decision was made. Whilst I sympathise with the loss of light the complainants may experience, the Ombudsman cannot question the professional judgement of the Planning Officer where there is no evidence of administrative fault.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings