Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (21 012 286)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Jul 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s consideration of a planning application. We are unlikely to find fault in the Council’s actions.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I shall call Mr X, complains the Council has allowed an inappropriate development without demanding a detailed application that addresses all reserved matters.
  2. He wants the Council to demand a full vehicle movement analysis of the proposed underground car park design.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council approved an outline planning application which included a condition requiring full details of the proposed car park layout to be provided as part of the Reserved Matters application.
  2. The Council confirms it has adopted a new parking standard since the original application was approved. This means the proposal for 17 resident parking spaces and three visitor spaces exceed the minimum required.
  3. The developer put in an application to discharge conditions on the original application. This included amendments to the parking layout.
  4. The Council also confirmed the layout of the basement parking has changed. The plans show the ramp specifications and the column positions, and the highways department confirm the proposals are acceptable.
  5. The amended application removed the requirement for the condition on the original planning permission.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find fault in the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings