London Borough of Barnet (21 010 234)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Nov 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to approve a planning application. The Council considered the neighbour’s objections before it made its decision. We are unlikely to find evidence of fault in the decision-making process.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, I shall call Mr X, says the Council failed to consider the impact on his property when it approved his neighbour’s planning application.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant, including the Council’s responses and the information on the Council’s website.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with the planning application for an extension to Mr X’s neighbour’s home as I am unlikely to find fault.
  2. The Ombudsman does not act as an appeal body for planning decisions. We must consider if there was any fault with how the decision was made.
  3. I am satisfied the Council properly considered the impact on Mr X’s home before granting planning permission. The planning officer addressed the impact on the impact on light to Mr X’s kitchen. They decided it was not sufficient to warrant refusal. I understand Mr X disagrees, but the planning officer was entitled to use their professional judgement and we cannot question this unless the process was tainted by fault. As the Council properly considered the application it is unlikely I could find such fault.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find fault in the way the Council made the decision to approve the planning application.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings