East Lindsey District Council (21 009 947)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Nov 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Ms X complains about the Council’s decision on a planning application for a development at a site close to her home. We will not investigate the complaint because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Ms X, complains about the Council’s decision on a planning application for a development at a site close to her home. She says the accuracy of plans and residents’ concerns were not properly considered by the Council.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant, including the Council’s responses to her complaint.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I gave Ms X the opportunity to comment on my draft decision and considered what she said.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We cannot question a decision a council has made if it followed the right steps and considered the relevant information and evidence.
  2. While I understand Ms X may not agree with the decision the Council has made, I have seen no evidence to suggest fault affected. It is for officers, exercising their professional judgement, to determine applications and while Ms X may have a different view, this is not evidence of fault.
  3. In responding to my draft decision, Ms X says the loss of tress and the impact on the local amenity were not properly considered. However, these issues were considered by the Council but were not found to be reasons to refuse permission.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings