Sedgemoor District Council (21 009 822)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Feb 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her neighbour’s planning application. This is because there is no evidence to show it is to blame for the delay in Mrs X receiving her consultation letter and it properly considered the impact of the proposed development in any case.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mrs X, complains the Council’s consultation letter about her neighbour’s planning application arrived too late for her to comment on the proposed development. She is also unhappy with the development the Council approved.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has provided Mrs X with evidence from its system to show it sent the consultation letters on the correct date. There is no duty or obligation for it to send consultation letters by special or recorded delivery and it is at least as likely that the delay resulted from issues with the postal service as any fault by the Council. We could not therefore say, on balance, that the Council was responsible for the full period of the delay and that its actions prevented Mrs X from commenting on her neighbour’s proposal.
  1. However, regardless of the reasons for the delay we could not say it caused Mrs X significant injustice. This is because the planning officer’s report shows the Council considered the impact of the development on her property even without her comments and it is therefore unlikely that anything she may have said would have changed its decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because there is no evidence of fault by the Council in its consultation with neighbours or affecting its decision to grant planning permission.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings