Teignbridge District Council (21 005 588)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 Jul 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about a planning decision. This is because the complaint has been made by a parish council. We cannot investigate complaints from public bodies such as parish councils.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mr B, complains on behalf of a parish council about the Council’s decision to grant planning permission for an outbuilding. Mr B says Council officers did not visit the site and the Council ignored objections put in by the parish council. Mr B also says the Council has provided conflicting information about how it considered the application.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate complaints from public bodies. (Local Government Act 1974, section 27(1)(a), as amended)
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint. This is because Mr B is complaining on behalf of a parish council. We do not have the power to investigate complaints made by public bodies such as parish councils.
  2. Also, even if Mr B wanted to complain as a member of the public, we would not investigate.
  3. Mr B does not live next to the application site and is not affected by the approved development. So, he has not suffered an injustice because of the alleged fault.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint because it is from a public body.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings