Guildford Borough Council (21 005 443)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Sep 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council decisions on two planning applications for a property close to the complainants’ home. This is because there is no evidence to suggest fault by the Council affected its decisions on the applications.

The complaint

  1. The complainants, who I refer to as Mr and Mrs X, complain that, despite objecting to two planning applications relating to a neighbouring property, the Council granted permission for them. They say the current permissions have allowed for window types their own property could not have when they bought it a number of years ago.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A((6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I spoke to Mr X and considered the information provided.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council granted planning permission for applications relating to a site close the complainants’ home. They complained to the Council about this and that the new development is allowed to have style of window which their property was not allowed at the time it was built.
  2. The Council responded to their complaint, noting their disagreement with the decisions that had been made but did not uphold it.
  3. It is not our role to review the merits of decisions properly taken by councils. We cannot question a decision made by a council if it has followed the right steps and considered the relevant evidence and information. While I understand Mr and Mrs X disagree with the decisions made, I have seen no evidence to suggest there was fault by the Council in coming to these decisions.
  4. Planning law and policies change over time and councils must determine planning applications based on those which exist at the time the application is made.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr and Mrs X’s complaint because there is no evidence to suggest fault by the Council affected its decisions on the applications.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings