South Staffordshire District Council (21 001 755)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Jun 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains about planning applications made by his neighbour. We will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient injustice caused to him to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about planning applications made by his neighbour.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • it is unlikely we would find fault, or
  • the fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • the injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered the comments of the complainant and the Council and the complainant has commented on the draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X says that his neighbour made a series of planning applications based on incorrect information supplied to the Council. The most recent was for continued use of a horse riding area (which had previously been limited). He contends that information about ownership was incorrect and so the planning applications should have been rejected.
  2. He says that the effect of granting planning permission for this meant that he notices horses riding past his house at unsociable hours.
  3. The Council says that the ownership certificate relates to the right to object by an owner; it is not necessary to own land in order to make a planning application. Mr X objected to the planning application. Any disputes about ownership are a civil matter and not a planning consideration.
  4. Nevertheless, I am not persuaded that the claimed injustice warrants investigation. Nuisance from horse riders could occur whether or not planning permission was granted.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because there is insufficient injustice to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings