London Borough of Enfield (20 011 762)

Category : Planning > Planning applications

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Mar 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot lawfully investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council’s refusal of his planning application is due to administrative errors. Mr X has used his right of appeal to the planning inspector.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council has not properly considered his planning application for development at a property. He says the Council refused the application on a flawed officer report and there are procedural irregularities. Mr X says he has suffered time, trouble, and distress. He will suffer financial loss due to the delay in the project.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a government minister. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of a government minister. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  2. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
  • delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
  • a decision to refuse planning permission
  • conditions placed on planning permission
  • a planning enforcement notice.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered Mr X’s information, the complaint correspondence, and information about the application on the Council’s planning website.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Late in 2020 the Council refused planning permission due to overdevelopment of the site and insufficient facilities at the property which is a house in multiple occupation. Mr X has appealed to the planning inspector against the refusal. The Council says he has also applied for an award of costs.

Analysis

  1. I cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint which is outside the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction. This is because he has appealed to the planning inspector (see paragraphs 2 and 3 above). We cannot investigate the handling of this case including the quality of the officer report.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman cannot lawfully investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council refusal of his planning application is due to administrative errors. Mr X has used his right of appeal to the planning inspector.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings