West Lindsey District Council (20 009 713)
Category : Planning > Planning applications
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 08 Feb 2021
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: Mr X complains about planning permission for a neighbour’s property and the service of an enforcement notice upon him. We will not investigate this complaint because he has a right of appeal against the notice and the planning permission is out of time.
The complaint
- Mr X complains about planning permission for a neighbour’s property and the service of an enforcement notice upon him.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
- The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b))
- The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
- delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
- a decision to refuse planning permission
- conditions placed on planning permission
- a planning enforcement notice.
How I considered this complaint
- I have considered the comments of the complainant and the Council and the complainant has commented on the draft decision.
What I found
- Planning permission was granted by the Council in August 2019 for Mr X’s neighbour to build a single storey extension.
- The grant of planning permission is out of time because I see no reason why a complaint could not have been made about this matter to this office within 12 months of the decision.
- Mr X says that the neighbour damaged his property in the construction and he breached a covenant. The damage to his property and the covenant are private matters and not fault by the Council.
- The Council served an enforcement notice upon Mr X for erecting a covered walkway. Mr X had a right of appeal to a Planning Inspector against this. The Planning Inspectorate is an expert body and their decisions are binding on the Council. I see no reason why an appeal could not be made in this case.
Final decision
- I do not intend to investigate this complaint because part of the complaint is out of time, part could be appealed to a Planning Inspector.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman