North Yorkshire Council (25 013 738)

Category : Planning > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council handled Mr X’s complaint. This is because there was no significant injustice to Mr X to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council delayed responding to his complaint and refused his request to escalate it to the second stage in its complaints process. Mr X says the delay and handling of his complaint has made him upset, disappointed and frustrated. Mr X wants the Council to improve its complaints procedures and avoid delays responding to complaints in future.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council about its delay and handling of his complaint to its planning department.
  2. The Council explained to Mr X his complaint was complicated by a related live enforcement case. It explained his complaint had been put on hold until the enforcement case complaint was complete.
  3. The Council accepted the delays responding to Mr X’s complaint fell below the standards expected and issued an apology to Mr X.
  4. I understand Mr X may have found the matter frustrating. However, I do not consider the injustice he has suffered because of how the Council dealt with his complaint significant enough to warrant an investigation by the Ombudsman.

Back to top

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there was no significant injustice to Mr X to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings