Other


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Mid Sussex District Council (19 009 822)

    Statement Not upheld Other 31-Mar-2020

    Summary: There was no fault in how the Council handled a section 106 agreement for new housing development where Mr B lives.

  • Stratford-on-Avon District Council (19 008 806)

    Statement Not upheld Other 25-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mr X complained the Council failed to enforce planning conditions on a development near his home. He said he suffered disruption and unsightly views as a result of this. We have found no fault with the Council's actions and have closed the case.

  • Arun District Council (19 009 916)

    Statement Not upheld Other 23-Mar-2020

    Summary: There is no fault in the way the Council dealt with planning applications to vary access arrangements to residential developments on land next to Mr and Mrs X's home.

  • Warwick District Council (19 006 545)

    Statement Not upheld Other 19-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mr X complains the Council is failing to discharge its duties under section 2A of the Self Build and Custom Housebuilding Act 2015, as amended. Based on the documentation currently available there is no evidence of fault in the way the Council has met its duties under the Self-Build and Custom Housebuilding Act 2015.

  • Birmingham City Council (19 009 353)

    Statement Not upheld Other 18-Mar-2020

    Summary: There is no evidence of fault in the Council's decision that a housebuilder will have to wait for the roads outside the new houses to be adopted before he can apply for dropped kerbs from the highway department.

  • Aylesbury Vale District Council (19 006 301)

    Statement Upheld Other 11-Mar-2020

    Summary: The Council is not at fault for not refunding the application fee of £462 when it did not determine Mr and Mrs X's application for a Lawful Development Certificate within 26 weeks and within the extension period agreed with Mr and Mrs X. The Council is at fault as it delayed in dealing with Mr and Mrs X's complaint. It has apologised for this which is a sufficient and proportionate remedy.

  • Thurrock Council (19 002 338)

    Statement Upheld Other 11-Mar-2020

    Summary: The complaint concerns unauthorised development in the greenbelt. There was failure by the Council to take the action it had identified as being necessary between September 2018 and September 2019.

  • Wokingham Borough Council (19 010 484)

    Statement Not upheld Other 10-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council's decision to install higher lampposts on its land, because it affects his amenity. There was no fault in the way the Council made its decision.

  • Allerdale Borough Council (19 011 244)

    Statement Not upheld Other 06-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mr X complained the Council gave him incorrect planning advice and then breached an agreement when it refused his planning application. He said he incurred significant expenses based on the agreement with the Council. There is no fault with the way the Council provided advice and have closed Mr X's complaint.

  • West Sussex County Council (19 011 394)

    Statement Not upheld Other 20-Feb-2020

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council's decision to refuse a second vehicle crossover to his property. The Council was not at fault.