Peterborough City Council (25 000 053)
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council did not follow planning guidance and failed to carry out a proper flood risk assessment. This is because the complainant is complaining on behalf of a Parish Council and not as a member of the public.
The complaint
- Ms X has complained on behalf of a Parish Council about the discharge of water from a development. Ms X has raised many concerns about the Council’s actions in relation to its decision to permit water discharge from the development. Ms X says the matter has led to flooding problems and has caused financial loss.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- We can only accept complaints from members of the public who claim to have suffered injustice, or from their authorised representative. This means we cannot accept complaints from councillors complaining on behalf of their council because they are not doing so as a member of the public. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26A, as amended)
- We cannot investigate complaints from public bodies. (Local Government Act 1974, section 27(1)(a), as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by Ms X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because we can only accept complaints from members of the public or their authorised representatives. Ms X is not complaining as a member of the public and is instead complaining on behalf of a Parish Council.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman