Cheshire East Council (24 015 774)

Category : Planning > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the imposition of a Community Infrastructure Levy as there is a right of appeal to a Planning Inspector and the Valuation Office Agency.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the Council has sought payment of a Community Infrastructure Levy for work to a property he no longer owns.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  2. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
  • Delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
  • A decision to refuse planning permission
  • Conditions placed on planning permission
  • A planning enforcement notice.
  1. We investigate complaints about councils and certain other bodies. We cannot investigate the actions of bodies such as the Valuation Office Agency. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 25 and 34(1), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says that the Council has imposed a Community Infrastructure Levy on him for a property he sold in November 2023. He says he was not responsible for notifying the Council of the work or its commencement.
  2. The Council says that, as owner, he was responsible for the application, and notification, of the Community Infrastructure Levy.
  3. The law provides that Mr X can appeal to a Planning Inspector against the decision to impose a surcharge or the commencement date of the work.
  4. Mr X can also appeal to the Valuation Office Agency about the apportionment of the liability.
  5. The Planning Inspectorate is an independent body which can determine any dispute about such decisions. I see no reason why an appeal could not be made in this case and so the complaint is out of jurisdiction. The Valuation Office Agency is a body out of jurisdiction.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he can appeal to the Planning Inspector and Valuation Office Agency.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings