Isle of Wight Council (23 009 691)

Category : Planning > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Oct 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to follow the complaints process. We do not consider this has caused the complainant sufficient personal injustice to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, I shall call Mr X, complains the Council took 15 weeks to respond to his complaint about actions of officers following his report of a breach of planning control.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complains the Council failed to consider his complaint and evidence about the actions of officers following his report of a breach of planning control by his neighbour. He wants the Council to:
    • instruct a qualified independent person to investigate his report of a breach of planning control; and
    • if any breaches are found the structure should be altered to comply with the planning permission or removed entirely.
  2. The Council has inspected the site of the reported breach of planning control. It has decided it is not expedient to taken enforcement action against his neighbour’s garden building which has not been built according to the approved plans.
  3. Mr X previously complained to us about the Council’s decision not to take enforcement action and that officers lied when they told him they had taken full measurements. The Ombudsman has issued a final decision statement on these points. We will not revisit these matters.
  4. This complaint is about the Council’s failure to follow its complaints procedure. We expect the Council to follow its complaints procedure and adhere to deadlines. However, the Council has apologised for the delay in its response which we consider a suitable remedy for this fault. We do not consider that Mr X has suffered significant personal injustice because of failings in dealing with his complaint alone to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we do not consider Mr X has suffered a significant personal injustice because of the failure to follow the complaint procedure alone to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings