Birmingham City Council (22 002 195)

Category : Planning > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 May 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains that the Council charged him an incorrect fee for a planning application. We will not investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of administrative fault by the Council and he can make a planning application to determine the correct planning application to submit.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the Council charged him an incorrect fee for a planning application.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b))
  2. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
  • delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
  • a decision to refuse planning permission
  • conditions placed on planning permission
  • a planning enforcement notice.
  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We cannot question whether an organisation’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. The complainant had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says that he wished to change part of the use of his property from commercial to residential. The Council says that this would attract a fee of £120. Mr X says that this fee is incorrect. It is not for the Ombudsman to question the merit of the Council’s decision in the absence of administrative fault.
  2. Further, any dispute as to whether planning permission is required can be the subject of a Lawful Development Certificate application if Mr X believes that the intended use does not require planning permission. Any such decision can be appealed to a Planning Inspector.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault and there can, ultimately be an appeal to a Planning Inspector.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings