Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council (21 017 677)

Category : Planning > Other

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 03 Apr 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains about delay by the Council in removing comments in a planning case. We will not investigate this complaint because the matter has been remedied.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about delay by the Council in removing comments in a planning case.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions a council has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I considered the complainant’s comments on my draft decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X submitted a planning application. He says that some of the comments made (and uploaded to the planning portal) were underlying racist.
  2. He told the Planning Officer who had visited. However, the Planning Officer then went on leave for a week. The Council reviewed the comments and, although taking the view that the comments were not racist, decided to remove the comments from the portal. The comments were removed approximately three weeks after being reported by Mr X.
  3. The Council apologised for the delay in their removal.
  4. Any racist comments made in public are a criminal matter for the Police to investigate.
  5. I am satisfied that the Council properly investigated the matter and considered the question of their removal. Whilst it is unfortunate that the comments were removed later than would be expected, the Council apologised and we consider that to be a reasonable settlement to this complaint. Their consideration as to whether the comments should be removed was made without administrative fault and so the Ombudsman would not question the merit of that decision.
  6. Any dispute about the final planning application decision was a matter for the Planning Inspector.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I do not intend to investigate this complaint because the matter has been remedied.
     

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings