London Borough of Waltham Forest (21 016 661)

Category : Planning > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Mar 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a disputed Certificate of Lawfulness application fee. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. It is reasonable to expect the complainant to pursue an appeal to the Planning Inspectorate.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Ms X, is a planning agent and says the Council is charging the wrong fee for her client’s Certificate of Lawfulness application. Ms X says the dispute makes her look incompetent as an agent.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b))
  2. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector can consider appeals about delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council, which consisted of their complaint correspondence.
  2. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The restriction detailed in paragraphs 2 and 3 above applies to Ms X’s complaint. This is because where a council refuses to validate an application because it considers the correct fee was not paid, the applicant may wait and appeal for non‑determination. The Planning Inspector can then decide whether they have jurisdiction to determine the appeal by deciding, amongst other things, whether the amount paid was correct.
  2. I consider it reasonable to expect Ms X, or her client, to use this right of appeal, so the Ombudsman has no jurisdiction to investigate the complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect her to appeal to the Planning Inspectorate.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings