West Berkshire Council (21 009 832)
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the effect of public works on the complainant’s property. This is because it is out of our jurisdiction as it is reasonable to expect the complainant to appeal to a tribunal.
The complaint
- The complainant, to whom I refer here as Mrs B, says that the Council mismanaged construction of a culvert inside and on the edge of her property. Mrs B considers that the whole process of constructing a culvert was overly lengthy and extremely stressful. She would expect compensation from the Council and some consequential drainage work on her property as well as determining the boundary between her and the Council’s land in accordance with the original agreement.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal.
(Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by Mrs B and the Council.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- Public works adjacent to Mrs B’s property started in 2016 and were marked, as stated by Mrs B, by continuous Council’s failures to provide her with plans, the Council’s contradictory statements regarding compensation and further works on the stream in Mrs B’s garden. Mrs B complains that at some stage of the construction works the Council’s contractors trespassed on Mrs B’s property.
- Mrs B says that the Council has been changing its position regarding a piece of land which was in the past agreed for Mrs B to keep. This matter necessitated instructing a solicitor and further unnecessary expenses for Mrs B.
- The Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) considers compensation cases for the negative effect on land caused by public works. It is reasonable for Mrs B to use this route.
- Moreover, we would not be able to achieve outcomes sought by Mrs B – determining her compensation claim and resolving the dispute over the piece of land. Compensation claims can only be pursued in courts or tribunals. When the ownership of land is disputed, a claim for adverse possession can be made in the Land Registry.
Final decision
We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because it is out of our jurisdiction as it is reasonable to expect Mrs B to appeal to a tribunal.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman