Medway Council (21 009 431)
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to close a runway on an airfield close to the complainants home. This is because the events happened too long ago, and I see no reason why the complainant couldn’t have complained sooner.
The complaint
- The complainant, who I will call Mr X, complains about the Council’s decision to close a runway on an airfield close to his home. Mr X says the Council made its decision without considering the impact transferring all flights onto a single flight path would have on residents.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- I will not investigate this complaint. This is because the decision to close the runway happened too long ago. Records show that Mr X was aware of the Council’s plans to close the runway in 2018, and the runway finally closed in 2019. I see no reason why he could not have complained to the Ombudsman sooner.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the complaint is late and I see no reason why he could not have complained sooner.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman