City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (26 011 149)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to take planning enforcement action against Mr X. Mr X has a right of appeal to the Planning Inspector which it is reasonable to expect him to use.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s decision to take planning enforcement action against him, and the Council’s complaint handling about the matter.
  2. Mr X said this caused distress.
  3. Mr X wants the Council to apologise, properly consider his complaint and review its processes.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  2. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about a planning enforcement notice.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained the Council decided to take enforcement action about his boundary treatment. Mr X said there is a similar development at a nearby property that did not need planning permission and is not subject to enforcement action.
  2. Government guidance says: “Effective enforcement is important as a means of maintaining public confidence in the planning system. Enforcement action is discretionary, and local planning authorities should act proportionately in responding to suspected breaches of planning control.” (National Planning Policy Framework December 2024, paragraph 60)
  3. We consider our powers on what we could achieve as part of our consideration of whether an alternative remedy exists and whether it is reasonable for a person to use it.
  4. Any dispute about planning enforcement can be appealed to a Planning Inspector. The Planning Inspector is an independent body. I see no reason why such an appeal could not be made in this case.
  5. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we decide not to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect him to appeal to the Planning Inspector.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings