Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
London Borough of Brent (25 014 914)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 24-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about planning matters associated with premises near Mr X’s business. We investigated some of the matters in 2023 and the remaining issues raised by Mr X more than 12 months ago and we will not exercise discretion to consider them now.
-
London Borough of Hounslow (25 013 947)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 24-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to act against Mr X’s landlord. This is because the complaint is late and we have seen no reason why Mr X could not complain to us much sooner.
-
Broadland District Council (25 005 712)
Statement Not upheld Enforcement 23-Feb-2026
Summary: Mr X complained about the way the Council decided to approve a discharge of conditions application and the way it investigated reports of breaches of planning control. We do not find fault with the process the Council followed to reach its decisions.
-
Vale Of White Horse District Council (25 014 341)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 23-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about the implementation of planning requirements for a developer to provide a link path on a private estate. This complaint was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mr X could not have complained to us sooner.
-
London Borough of Waltham Forest (24 023 015)
Statement Upheld Enforcement 20-Feb-2026
Summary: Ms X complained about errors in the Council’s consideration of her neighbour's planning applications dating back to 2014. We found no fault in the Council’s decision-making when considering enforcement action. There was fault when it failed to decide one of Ms X’s neighbour’s applications, but this did not cause Ms X significant injustice. There was also fault when the Council delayed responding to Ms X’s stage two complaint. Its earlier apology is sufficient remedy for the frustration caused.
-
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 20-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to remove an enforcement notice on Mr X’s property. Mr X appealed to the Planning Inspector against the notice, although many years ago. He also confirms the courts have considered the matter. The law says we cannot investigate complaints about matters which have been appealed and/or considered by the courts.
-
Waverley Borough Council (25 015 564)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 20-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council dealt with a planning application and subsequent enforcement action. The complainant has appealed to the Planning Inspector and the complaint is therefore out of our jurisdiction.
-
London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (25 006 641)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 19-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council considered a report of a breach of planning control. Nor can we achieve the outcome the complainant is seeking.
-
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 18-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council considered Mr X’s reports of breaches of planning control. We have not seen enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions to warrant an investigation.
-
Forest of Dean District Council (25 013 775)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 18-Feb-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Miss X complaint about the Council’s consideration of her neighbours planning application. There is insufficient evidence of fault to justify an investigation.