Teignbridge District Council (24 018 861)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 May 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to take action against a breach of planning control. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions and further investigation will not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council has failed to take enforcement action against her neighbour for a breach of planning control.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X reported a breach of planning control at her neighbour’s property.
  2. The Council confirms an officer visited the site. Their report confirms the development is acceptable in planning terms and they advised the neighbour to put in a retrospective planning application. However, it also says if an application is not received, it is not expedient to take enforcement action. Any enforcement action would be solely to regularise the development.
  3. The Ombudsman does not act as an appeal body for planning decisions. Instead, we consider if there was any fault with how the decision was made. The evidence I have seen shows the Council visited the site, assessed the breach and came to a decision. This is the process we expect to see. Therefore we cannot criticise the decision not to take enforcement action against the breach of planning control.
  4. I understand the Council delayed in advising Miss X of its decision. It has apologised for this and further investigation will not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because:
    • There is not enough evidence of fault in the way the Council made its decision not to take enforcement action; and
    • We consider further investigation will not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings