Shropshire Council (24 016 744)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with breaches of planning control. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.

The complaint

  1. Mr X has complained about how the Council has dealt with possible breaches of planning control at a site near his home and its decision not to take enforcement action against his neighbour.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X reported several possible planning breaches to the Council. The Ombudsman has previously considered Mr X’s complaints about the Council’s decision not to take enforcement action, and we will not consider the same matters again as part of this complaint.
  2. Mr X says he has been in correspondence with the Council since we sent our previous decisions about his complaints. He says some enforcement matters were ongoing and there have been further breaches. Mr X also says the Council failed to take action after his neighbour did not submit a retrospective planning application.
  3. However, I am satisfied the Council has properly looked into the concerns Mr X has raised and explained why its decision not to take enforcement action remains the same. I understand Mr X’s neighbour did not submit a retrospective application to regularise some of the work. But the Council has explained why this does not impact its enforcement decision.
  4. I understand Mr X disagrees, but the Council was entitled to use its professional judgement in this regard and councils do not need to take enforcement action just because there has been a planning breach. As the Council properly considered if it should take enforcement action it is unlikely we would find fault.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings