Wiltshire Council (24 003 519)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about planning enforcement as there is a right of appeal to a Planning Inspector and the injustice is not sufficient to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the Council advised him to remove items from his land as the Council believed there were in breach of planning law.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
  • Delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
  • A decision to refuse planning permission
  • Conditions placed on planning permission
  • A planning enforcement notice.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X owns land on which he received an enforcement enquiry from the Council. The Council asked about items in a workshop. Mr X says that the Enforcement Officer may be biased and the enquiry unjustified.
  2. Any enforcement notice by a Council can be appealed to a Planning Inspector. The Planning Inspectorate is an independent body which can determine any dispute about such decisions. I see no reason why an appeal could not be made in this case and so the complaint is out of jurisdiction.
  3. We do not consider that the injustice from the enquiry is in itself significant injustice to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he could appeal to a Planning Inspector and the injustice is not sufficient to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings