London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (23 009 507)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Oct 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a breach of planning control. This is because the complainant has the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall refer to as Dr B, has complained about the advice he received from the Council regarding the installation of replacement windows at his property. Dr B says he contacted the Council to ensure permission was not needed before the new windows were fitted. However, he has since been told the windows are unauthorised.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  3. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
  • Delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
  • A decision to refuse planning permission
  • Conditions placed on planning permission
  • A planning enforcement notice.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Dr B and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Dr B does not agree the new windows are harmful to the area and says similar windows have been fitted in other nearby properties. However, if Dr B does not agree the development is unauthorised, he can decide to take no action and appeal to the Planning Inspector if the Council issues an enforcement notice. Dr B can also apply for planning permission to regularise the situation or for a certificate of lawful development if he believes planning permission is not needed. Dr B would then have a right to appeal to the Planning Inspector if the Council refused the applications.
  2. I consider it would be reasonable for Dr B to use his right of appeal. The Ombudsman will not usually investigate when someone has a right to appeal to the Planning Inspector, even if the appeal would not address all the issues complained about.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Dr B’s complaint because he has the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings