London Borough of Bromley (23 004 336)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Jul 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision on the complainant’s report of unauthorised development. There is no evidence of fault in the way the Council considered the report and decided not to take any action.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, I shall call Mr X complains the Council has failed to act on his report of a breach of planning control. He says the Council has discriminated against him and lied to him.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X reported a breach of planning control. He says someone has erected an unauthorised development in the green belt.
  2. A Council Planning Officer inspected the site. He established the structure is a temporary play shelter. The Council is satisfied there is no breach of planning control.
  3. We expect councils to consider allegations and decide what, if any, investigation is necessary. If a council decides there is a breach of control, it must consider what harm is caused to the public before deciding how to react. Providing the council is aware of its powers and follows this process, it is free to make its own judgement on how or whether to act.
  4. I am satisfied the Council responded properly to Mr X’s allegation of a breach of planning control. The Council has considered its powers, visited the site, and decided there in no planning breach. Without any administrative fault in the process, we cannot criticise the Council’s decision. I have seen no evidence to support Mr X’s claim of discrimination.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is no evidence of fault in the process the Council followed leading to its decision that there is no breach of planning control.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings