Bristol City Council (22 015 959)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Mar 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s delay in addressing a planning breach at a property next to Mr X’s home. This is because an investigation is unlikely to add to that already carried out by the Council or lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Mr X, complains about the Council’s delay in taking enforcement action against a planning breach at a neighbour’s property. He wants the Council to take immediate action and to compensate him for its delay.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council, including its response to his complaint.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X reported a planning breach by his neighbour to the Council in 2022 and the Council opened an enforcement case.
  2. When Mr X complained about Council delays in taking against the breach, the Council acknowledged its delay and upheld his complaint. It confirmed it had recently been in touch with the neighbour to request the submission of a retrospective planning application and this has now been received.
  3. There has been delay by the Council which it has acknowledged and apologised for. In accordance with normal procedures, the Council requested a retrospective planning application which has now been submitted and it will be determined in the usual way with Mr X able to submit his objections.
  4. We do not investigate every complaint we receive and while there has been delay by the Council in dealing with this case, an investigation by the Ombudsman is unlikely to add to the investigation already carried out by the Council or lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because an investigation is unlikely to add to that already carried out by the Council or lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings