Leicester City Council (22 012 890)
Category : Planning > Enforcement
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 17 Jan 2023
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about planning decisions because he has appealed to a Planning Inspector.
The complaint
- Mr X complains about the Council’s enforcement of his building development and their refusal of his planning applications.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a government minister. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of a government minister. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
- The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about:
- delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission
- a decision to refuse planning permission
- conditions placed on planning permission
- a planning enforcement notice.
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- Mr X says that the Council acted unfairly in investigating complaints about his property and whether planning permission was required.
- Any planning enforcement notice issued against Mr X could be appealed to a Planning Inspector and so the Ombudsman would not investigate this complaint.
- Mr X has since submitted three appeals to the Planning Inspector. For the reasons given above the Ombudsman would not investigate this complaint.
- Mr X says that the Council has acted unreasonably in the way it has considered his complaints. However, the Ombudsman considers that it is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman