What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

South Gloucestershire Council (22 007 459)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Sep 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to issue a Breach of Condition Notice. This is because there is no evidence to suggest fault affected the Council’s decision.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Mr X, says the Council is wrong not to issue a Breach of Condition Notice to a developer whose actions have impacted on his property.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’ which we call ‘fault’. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in the decision making, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council, including its responses to his complaint
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X believes the Council should take enforcement action against planning breaches by a developer by issuing a breach of Condition Notice.
  2. In responding to Mr X’s complaint about this matter, the Council explained that while it has the power to take such action it is not obliged to do so and it has not considered it expedient to do so in this case. It told Mr X he has civil law rights in relation to the impact of the development on his property which it is open to him to him to pursue.
  3. Mr X may disagree with the Council’s decision, but this is not evidence of fault. It is not our role to act as a point of appeal. We cannot question decisions taken by councils if they have followed the right steps and considered the relevant evidence and information.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is no evidence to suggest fault affected the Council’s decision.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings