Mendip District Council (21 011 936)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a planning enforcement matter. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault affecting its decision.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains the Council failed to take appropriate action to deal with a breach of planning control by his neighbour.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council accepts Mr X’s neighbour has carried out development which would ordinarily require planning permission. But there is no duty or obligation for the Council to take formal enforcement action in every case. The Council must consider the extent of any breach and its impact in deciding whether it should take formal action.
  2. The Council has visited Mr X’s property and while Mr X is unhappy with the way the visit was conducted, the officer saw his neighbour’s development and their measurements of the extent of the breach are broadly in line with Mr X’s. The Council has explained that altering the development to comply with what is allowed without the need for planning permission would not, in its view, significantly reduce its impact and it is not for us to question its judgement on this point.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings