Wakefield City Council (25 010 206)
Category : Planning > Building control
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 15 Dec 2025
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that his property has been damaged by Council-owned trees. This is because his complaint is late and we have seen no reason why he could not have complained to us much sooner.
The complaint
- Mr X complains the Council has failed to deal with a dangerous boundary wall at the rear of his home. He says the wall has been destabilised by tree roots growing from Council land leased to a school. He says the Council refuses to act as a responsible freeholder and refused to consider his complaint as the matter still with its property services team.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- In the information provided to us in support if his complaint, Mr X says he first reported the matter to the Council in 2023. Mr X did not complain to us until two years later in 2025.
- The law says a complaint must be made to use within 12 months pf the complainant becoming aware of the matter. Not when the complaint was first raised with the Council.
- I have seen no good reason Mr X could not have complained to us in time, if the Council was not taking the action he is seeking. The complaint is therefore late.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is late.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman