Torbay Council (21 017 447)

Category : Planning > Building control

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Mar 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a building control matter. This is because we could not achieve any worthwhile outcome for her.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Ms X, complains about the Council’s refusal to take action against an adjoining property owner for building work which has damaged her property.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Building Regulations set standards for the design and construction of buildings to ensure the health and safety of people in and about those buildings.
  2. Caselaw has established that local authorities are not responsible for the impact of substandard building work carried out, even where they have signed the work off as compliant with the Building Regulations. Liability rests with those responsible for the work; that is, the people carrying out the work and those who have commissioned it.
  3. Ms X is unhappy the Council did not stop her neighbour’s building work and that it has declined to prosecute them but its actions are not the cause of the injustice she claims. It is her neighbour’s building work which has damaged her property and we could not hold the Council responsible for this. If Ms X believes her case should be treated differently and that the Council is responsible for the damage she would need to argue this at court.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because we could not hold the Council responsible for the damage to her property. We cannot therefore achieve any worthwhile outcome for her by investigating the matter further.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings