Lincolnshire County Council (26 014 608)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council responded to Mr X’s information request. The Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to consider this complaint.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about delays by the Council in responding to his Subject Access Request (SAR). Mr X also complains the Council did not provide all the documents he requested.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained the Council exceeded statutory timeframes when responding to his SAR.
  2. Mr X also said the Council did not provide all the documents he requested when it responded to him.
  3. Mr X’s complaint would be better placed with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).
  4. The ICO was set up by parliament to consider complaints about breaches of data protection legislation.
  5. The ICO can consider the delays in the Council’s response and if it has properly responded to Mr X’s SAR.
  6. For this reason, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to consider it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings