Tunbridge Wells Borough Council (26 012 489)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about a council tax increase set by the Council. The law prevents us from investigating complaints that affect all or most people in an area. For the rest, the courts have said we can decide not to investigate a complaint about any action by an organisation concerning a matter which the law says we cannot investigate.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council provided inaccurate information in its budget so it could increase council tax in its area.
  2. Mr X also said he was prevented from questioning this at a public cabinet meeting, and said the Council refused to consider his resulting complaint.
  3. Mr X said this caused distress and frustration.
  4. Mr X wants the Council to return the extra revenue made by its council tax increase to taxpayers and discipline a senior officer for abusing their position.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate something that affects all or most of the people in a council’s area. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(7), as amended)
  3. The courts have said we can decide not to investigate a complaint about any action by an organisation concerning a matter which the law says we cannot investigate. (R (on the application of M) v Commissioner for Local Administration [2006] EHWCC 2847 (Admin))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We cannot investigate the substantive part of Mr X’s complaint. The law prevents us from investigating complaints about increases in council tax a local authority sets as it affects all or most people in the area.
  2. We will also not investigate Mr X’s complaints about the Council’s handling of a public cabinet meeting and the Council’s refusal to consider his complaint about the matter.
  3. The courts have said we can choose not to investigate a complaint about an organisation’s actions if the law says we are not allowed to investigate the substantive matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint because the substantive matter affects all or most people in the area. For the rest, the courts have said we can decide not to investigate complaints about the actions of a council concerning a matter the law says we cannot investigate.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings