Liverpool City Council (26 008 047)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about how the Council handled her request for documents. It is reasonable to expect Miss X to raise her concerns with the Information Commissioner’s Office.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained the Council wrongfully failed to provide her with copies of reports which she had requested.
  2. Miss X said this caused significant emotional distress and meant she was unable to obtain the items she requested. She wanted the Council to:
    • provide her with the items she originally requested;
    • conduct an internal investigation into its staff; and
    • apologise for its alleged failures.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X complained to the Council about the matters in paragraph one. The Council responded and sign-posted Miss X to its Information Team as her complaint related to data protection matters.
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons.
  3. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) considers complaints about data protection. It holds more powers than the Ombudsman to address these types of complaints.
  4. In this case there is no good reason for us to investigate the matter instead. In the absence of a wider complaint we could consider, the ICO is the best placed body to consider the issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because the Information Commissioner’s Office is the body best placed to consider the matter.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings