London Borough of Haringey (26 007 666)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how Mr X’s reasonable adjustments were considered. There is not enough evidence of fault in how the Council considered Mr X’s request.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council did not properly consider his request for reasonable adjustments.
  2. Mr X said it caused distress.
  3. Mr X would like the Council to consider his reasonable adjustment request and say why it had not responded.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X contacted the Council and asked it to make reasonable adjustments in how it communicated with him.
  2. The Council considered his request and wrote to Mr X saying some of the adjustments were already in place. For those that were not, it explained why it would not agree to them.
  3. Mr X complained that the Council had not considered his request under the Equality Act 2010 and it had not communicated its decision with him.
  4. We cannot find that an organisation has breached the Equality Act. However, we can find an organisation at fault for failing to take account of its duties under the Equality Act.
  5. The Council considered Mr X’s request for reasonable adjustments and wrote to him explaining which ones were already being met and which ones it did not agree to. In doing so, the Council took account of its duties under the Equality Act. Therefore, there is not enough evidence of fault in how the Council considered Mr X’s request to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault in how the Council considered his request for reasonable adjustments.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings