London Borough of Barking & Dagenham (26 006 342)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council refusing to investigate Miss X’s complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains about the Council’s refusal to investigate her complaint. She says she has raised concerns about inaccurate information the Council holds but says the Council has refused to investigate. Miss X says this has caused her significant stress and frustration. She wants the Council to investigate her complaint, acknowledge it was in the wrong, provide a financial remedy and review its procedures.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X made a subject access request and then complained to the Council that some of the information it held about her was inaccurate. The Council responded twice and explained its position. Miss X remained dissatisfied and asked the Council to escalate her complaint. The Council declined to do so, saying it had already addressed her concerns and there was nothing further to consider through its corporate complaints process. It advised Miss X to pursue the matter with the information commissioner’s office (ICO). The ICO is the appropriate body to consider data issues.
  2. We would usually expect a council to accept a complaint unless it has a valid reason not to do so. In this case, the Council considered Miss X’s concerns and explained why it would not consider the matter further through its corporate complaints process. I am satisfied the Council was entitled to reach this decision. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings