Southend-on-Sea City Council (26 005 636)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X's complaint about how the Council dealt with her information requests. We cannot decide what information a council should release or whether information has been correctly withheld or redacted. The Information Commissioner is best placed to consider these matters.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council has not properly dealt with concerns she raised in relation to a dispute involving her property and a local business. She says the Council relied on information provided by a third party but has not disclosed all the information she requested. She says the Council delayed responding to her information requests and did not comply with statutory timescales. She wants the Council to provide the requested information in full and without redactions.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X’s complaint is about the Council's handling of her information requests and its decision not to disclose information in the form she seeks.
  2. The Information Commissioner is the specialist body responsible for considering complaints about access to information and compliance with data protection legislation. The Information Commissioner has powers to consider whether the Council has responded appropriately to the requests, whether information has been withheld correctly and whether any further action is required. It is therefore reasonable for Mrs X to pursue the matter with the Information Commissioner.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint because we cannot decide what information a council should release or how it should respond to subject access requests.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because the ICO is better placed to deal with her complaint about how the Council dealt with her information request and her personal data was dealt with.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings