Stoke-on-Trent City Council (25 030 956)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the diversion signage and arrangements in place during roadworks. Mr X’s complaint is late, and we have seen no good reason why he could have complained to us sooner. Mr X also complains about the way the Council considered his complaint. We consider it is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council failed to deal with his complaint according to its complaint procedure. He also says the Council failed to carry our equality impact assessments or make reasonable adjustments.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X first complained to the Council in July 2025 , about diversions in place during roadworks carried out the previous January. He stated that if his complaint not resolved to his satisfaction, he would escalate his complaint to the Ombudsman.
  2. The Council provided a stage one response in July. It confirmed if he wanted to escalate his complaint, he should do so within ten days of receipt of its letter.
  3. Mr X did not escalate his complaint until December. The Council issued a final response in March 2026.
  4. The law says a complaint must be made to us within 12 months of the person becoming aware of the problem, not from when you first complain to the Council or the date of the Council’s last response. Mr X was aware of the problem with the roadworks in January 2025. He did not complaint to the Ombudsman until March 2026. Therefore, his complaint is late.
  5. I have considered whether to exercise discretion and investigate this late complaint. However, Mr X chose not to complain to the Council for at least six months from becoming concerned about the roadworks that took place in January. He mentioned the Ombudsman, so he was aware of our service. Mr X did not escalate his complaint for five months. I have seen no reason why he could not have complained to us sooner.
  6. Mr X also complains about the Council’s failure to follow its complaint procedure. We consider it is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is late and I have seen no reason why he could not have complained to us sooner.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings