What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Sheffield City Council (25 027 836)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a request for information. This is because the Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to deal with the matter.

The complaint

  1. Ms X says the Council wrongly treated correspondence about her Freedom of Information (FOI) and Subject Access Requests (SAR) as an internal review.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  3. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X says she did not request an internal review, and the Council did not address her concerns about the Council’s failure to disclose information.
  2. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint. It is reasonable to expect her to take the matter to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). The ICO is better placed to review complaints about the Council’s handling of FOI and SAR requests. It has the expertise to decide such matters, and can make necessary recommendations.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it concerns the Council’s handling of FOI and SAR requests, which the ICO is better placed to consider.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings