Kent County Council (25 026 702)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council handled a data rectification request. The Information Commissioner is better placed to consider and decide complaints about information rights.

The complaint

  1. Mrs Z complained the Council holds inaccurate information and has refused to correct it.
  2. Mrs Z said this caused distress.
  3. Mrs Z wants the Council to apologise, review its processes and correct the data.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs Z.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs Z complained to the Council that it held inaccurate and unsupported information about her.
  2. The Council considered Mrs Z’s request for data rectification and told her its position.
  3. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is the UK regulator for data protection and enforces the UK General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018. This includes data rectification matters.
  4. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because the ICO is better placed to consider and decide complaints about information rights.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs Z’s complaint because the ICO is better placed to consider and decide complaints about information rights.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings