Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (25 023 122)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Ms X’s complaint about actions of a Council staff. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault, in how the Council considered the matter, to justify investigating.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains that Y, a Council employee, defrauded her by issuing a fraudulent rental contract, which caused her distress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X stated that the Council rejected her complaint and failed to consider it in sufficient detail.
  2. The Council rejected Ms X’s complaint on the basis that it did not concern actions carried out by an employee in the course of their duties. It therefore considered the matter to fall outside its corporate complaints process. The Council said it would investigate the matter internally; however, Ms X would not be informed of the outcome as it relates to an employee matter.
  3. I have reviewed the complaint and the Council’s response. The complaint does concern the actions of a Council employee acting in a personal capacity, rather than on behalf of the Council. The Council’s view that the complaint falls outside its corporate complaints process is reasonable. It is therefore entitled to deal with the matter through its internal procedures. Therefore, I will not investigate this complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault in how the Council considered the matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings