Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (25 022 597)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mr X’s personal data. The Information Commissioner is better placed to consider the matter.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the Council holds incorrect personal data on file.
  2. Mr X said he was distressed following the Council and Councillors application of incorrect personal data.
  3. Mr X wanted the Council to have dealt with his complaint using a corporate complaints process.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council’s reply to Mr X’s complaint.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s handling of his personal data. The Council told Mr X their corporate complaints policy did not cover data protection matters.
  2. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is the UK’s independent authority set up to uphold information rights. It promotes openness by public bodies and protects privacy of individuals. It deals with complaints about public authorities’ failures to obey information rights legislation.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint. Where someone has a complaint about data protection, the Ombudsman usually expects them to bring the matter to the attention of the ICO. The ICO is in a better position than the Ombudsman to consider such complaints. It is reasonable to expect Mr X to approach the ICO

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the Information Commissioner is better placed to consider and decide the matter.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings