Surrey County Council (25 019 422)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s disclosure of Mr X’s personal data or its failure to include him in an important meeting. This is because complaints about personal data are best dealt with by the Information Commissioner’s Office and the remaining issues are inextricably linked to ongoing proceedings taking place in court.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained a Council employee disclosed personal information without his consent. He also complained the Council failed to include him in an important meeting.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.
  3. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  4. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained a Council employee disclosed personal data without his consent. He also complained the Council excluded him from an important meeting.
  2. We will not investigate complaints where there is another body better placed to oversee the complaint. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) was set up to deal with complaints regarding personal data disclosure; it would be reasonable for Mr X to refer this part of the complaint to the ICO.
  3. The Ombudsman will not investigate complaints that are inextricably linked to matters taking place in court. The Council has explained to Mr X that he can complain about missing the meeting once current court proceedings have finished. It is open to him to raise this complaint to the Council once proceedings have concluded.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because complaints about personal data are best dealt with by the Information Commissioner’s Office and the remaining issues are inextricably linked to ongoing proceedings taking place in court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings