Brighton & Hove City Council (25 018 078)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his child’s data and about its contact with Mr X on the matter. This is because complaints about data matters, such as this, are best considered and decided by the Information Commissioner’s Office.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council accessed his son’s record without any lawful basis, in response to contact from his mother. The Council then contacted Mr X, asking him intrusive and irrelevant personal questions and indicated it might disclose information to his son’s mother. Mr X says this caused him significant alarm, distress and ongoing anxiety and he has lost trust in the Council.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because it is about handling of personal data which is a data complaint best considered by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). This is the body set up to consider complaints about data issues such as this and so it is best placed to consider it. Mr X says the Council had no lawful basis for accessing his son’s personal data. This is a matter the ICO is best placed to consider and decide. We will not also do so.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is about a data matter best considered and decided by ICO.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings